深度解析GMAT阅读经典难题-【印第安水权】(11)
(E)It was modified by the Supreme Court in Arizonav. California.
原文定位: “Although this treaty
did not mention water rights
”因此D选项符合描述
2. The passage suggests that, if the criteria discussed in lines 10–20
[Later decisions, citing Winters, established that courts can find federal rights to reserve water for particular purposes if (1) the land in question lies within an enclave under exclusive federal jurisdiction, (2) the land has been formally withdrawn from federal public lands—i.e., withdrawn from the stock of federal lands available for private use under federal land use laws—and set aside or reserved, and (3) the circumstances reveal the government intended to reserve water as well as land when establishing the reservation.]
- 直播预告 | 埃森哲企业数字化转型论坛·两化融合深度行
- 42股成功跨越3000点,三维度解析牛股基因(附9月十大金股)
- 【深度长文】规模大赚钱就是好公司?政府要推动最基础的大国重器
- 解析 | 客观看事件!专家为你剖析“两潮地区”水情的几大原因!
- 当众人夺路而跑时,不跟随——投资高手们的深度思考
- 新疆喀什伽师县发生5.5级地震 震源深度8千米
- 台湾花莲发生4.3级地震 震源深度17.7公里
- 亲人不睦,家必败!(深度好文)
- “将有温度有深度有力度的中国故事讲给非洲受众”
- 穷人在抢房,富人在抢命!(深度好文)