深度解析GMAT阅读经典难题-【印第安水权】(14)
(B)
Arizona v. California establishes that the Winters doctrine applies to a broader range of situations than those defined by these criteria.
(C)Arizona v. California represents the sole example of an exception to the criteria as they were set forth in the Winters doctrine.
(D)Arizona v. California does not refer to the Winters doctrine to justify water rights, whereas these criteria do rely on the Winters doctrine.
(E)Arizona v. California applies the criteria derived from the Winters doctrine only to federal lands other than American Indian reservations.
Arizona将winter的试用范围扩展了。因此B选项符合描述。
- 直播预告 | 埃森哲企业数字化转型论坛·两化融合深度行
- 42股成功跨越3000点,三维度解析牛股基因(附9月十大金股)
- 【深度长文】规模大赚钱就是好公司?政府要推动最基础的大国重器
- 解析 | 客观看事件!专家为你剖析“两潮地区”水情的几大原因!
- 当众人夺路而跑时,不跟随——投资高手们的深度思考
- 新疆喀什伽师县发生5.5级地震 震源深度8千米
- 台湾花莲发生4.3级地震 震源深度17.7公里
- 亲人不睦,家必败!(深度好文)
- “将有温度有深度有力度的中国故事讲给非洲受众”
- 穷人在抢房,富人在抢命!(深度好文)