深度解析GMAT阅读经典难题-【印第安水权】(14)

(B)

Arizona v. California establishes that the Winters doctrine applies to a broader range of situations than those defined by these criteria.

(C)Arizona v. California represents the sole example of an exception to the criteria as they were set forth in the Winters doctrine.

(D)Arizona v. California does not refer to the Winters doctrine to justify water rights, whereas these criteria do rely on the Winters doctrine.

(E)Arizona v. California applies the criteria derived from the Winters doctrine only to federal lands other than American Indian reservations.

Arizona将winter的试用范围扩展了。因此B选项符合描述。