1、微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,1,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,2,历史沿革,来自希腊语： spondylo(椎体)和Listhesis(滑移)集合而成 。
1782年 Herbinlaux最先描述了腰5椎体前滑脱病例 。
1854年 Kilian首先定义脊柱滑脱症(spondylisthesis):“一椎体在另一椎体上部分或完全的滑移” 。
1957年 Taillard将脊柱滑脱症定义为“由于关节突间连续断裂或延长而引起椎体与其椎弓根、横突和上关节突一同向前滑移 。
,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,3,流行性病学,Fredricks 。

2、on BE, et al. The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984, 500 participants,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,4,Jacobsen s Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis:An Epidemiological Perspective. spine. 2007, 4151 participants， M ：1533、F：2618 254cases(11.1,M(1.5%):F(5.9,M(0. 。

3、7%):F(1.2,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,5,Kalichman L ， Kinm DH, Li L, etal. Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis.Prevalence and Association With Low Back Pain in the Adult Community-Based Population. spine. 2009, 3529 participants， CT :11.5,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,6,腰椎滑脱的Wiltse分型,Wiltse LL ， Newman PH, MacNab I. Clas 。

4、sification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop,1976,117:23-29,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,7,腰椎滑脱程度（Meyerding分型 ， 1932,Meyerding HW. Spondylolisthesis: surgical treatment and resultsJ. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1932, 54: 371-37,I,II,III,IV,V,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,8,症状,马尾综合症,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,9,滑脱进展, 。

5、Labelle H, Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P. Spino-pelvic sagittal balance of spondylolisthesis: a review and classication Eur Spine J,2011,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,10,滑脱进展,申勇.中国矫形外科杂志 ,2005,40y,43y,45y,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,11,滑脱进展,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,12,滑脱进展主要因素,PI BMI Angle of lordosis Bilateral pars defects, 。

6、Jacobsen s. spine. 2007, Labelle H, Eur Spine J,2011 Beutler WJ, Spine,2003,PI,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,13,手术治疗指征,持续或反复发作的腰腿痛、间歇性跛行, 严重影响日常生活, 经合理的非手术治疗 ( 3个月或 3个月以上 ) 无效者;
神经功能障碍进行性加重者;
出现大小便功能异常者,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,14,手术与非手术治疗,2-4年随访 ， LDS手术疗效优于非手术,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,15,开放性手术,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,16,开放手 。

7、术,优点 学习曲线短 显露充分、视野大,缺点 椎旁肌肉损伤多 住院时间长 出血多 创伤大 风险高,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,17,微创手术,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,18,微创手术,优点 创伤小 住院时间短 出血小 术后疼痛轻 康复快 并发症少,缺点 学习曲线长 ， 难掌握 对手术者技术要求高 ， 手术难度大 要求手术者有良好的三维解剖知识 需要专用器械 ， 增加手术成本 暴露不充分 ， 视野小,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,19,微创 VS 开放：腰椎滑脱,Open,Mini,Who is best,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,20,PLIF）微创 VS 开 。

8、放： 长期疗效,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,21,PLIF）微创 VS 开放： 长期疗效,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,22,TLIF）微创 VS 开放： 疗效,Conclusion： Minimally invasive surgery（TLIF） for severe SDS（I-II grade） leads to adequate and safe decompression of lumbar stenosis and results in a faster recovery of symptoms and disability in the early pos 。

9、toperative period,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,23,PLF）微创 VS 开放： 疗效,Conclusion： The MIS-PLF utilizing a percutaneous pedicle screw system had less invasive, less postoperative pain, rapid improvement of several functional parameters compared to conventional open-PLF. This superiority in the MIS-PLF group was。

10、maintained until 2 years postoperatively, suggesting that less invasive PLF offers better mid-term results in terms of reducing low back pain and improving patients functional capacity of daily living,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,24,PLF）微创 VS 开放： 疗效,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,25,ALIF+TLIF）微创 VS 开放：并发症,Conclusion: M 。

11、IS(ALIF+TLIF) had less blood loss, less need for transfusion in the perioperative period, and a shorter hospital stay than open(ALIF+TLIF), but the length of surgery, intraoperative uoroscopy time, malpositioned instrumentation on postoperative imaging, and postoperative complications, including pul 。

12、monary embolus and surgical site infection no difference,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,26,P/TLIF）微创 VS 开放：感染率,Conclusions： In this multihospital study, the MI technique（P/TLIF） was associated with a decreased incidence of perioperative SSI (27 4.6% vs 150 7.0%, p = 0.037) in 2-level fusion. There was no signi 。

13、ficant difference in the incidence of SSIs (38 4.5% vs 77 4.8%, p = 0.77) between the open and MI cohorts for 1-level fusion procedures,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,27,PLIF)微创 VS 开放：多裂肌损伤,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,28,微创 VS 开放：多裂肌损伤,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,29,微创 VS 开放： 费效分析,CONCLUSIONS: MIS TLIF resulted in reduced ope 。

【微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症|微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症课件】14、rative blood loss, hospital stay and 2-year cost, and accelerated return to work. Surgical morbidity, hospital readmission, and short- and long-term clinical effectiveness were similar between MIS and open TLIF. MIS TLIF may represent a valuable and cost-saving advancement from a societal and hospit 。

15、al perspective,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,30,微创 VS 开放：住院时间短、费用少,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,31,TLIF）微创 VS 开放： Meta分析,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,32,Mini-TLIF VS mini-ALIF：疗效,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,33,Mini-TLIF VS mini-ALIF：疗效,MALIF,MTLIF,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,34,Mini-TLIF VS mini-ALIF：疗效,Conclusions：Considering the clinical an 。

16、d radiological outcomes in both groups, the authors recommend that instrumented mini-TLIF is preferable at the L45 level, whereas instrumented mini-ALIF might be preferable at the L5S1 level for the treatment of unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,35,正确掌握腰椎滑脱的治疗原则(侯树勋,不是所有的腰椎滑脱都需要治疗 伴有腰痛的腰椎滑脱并非都需要手术 根据滑脱的严重程度选择适当的手术方式 滑脱椎体的融合是手术治疗的最终目的,微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症,36,Thanks for your attention 。

来源：(未知)

【学习资料】网址：/a/2021/0321/0021740103.html

标题：微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症|微创与开放手术治疗I-II度腰椎滑脱症课件